Showing posts with label Davis Guggenheim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Davis Guggenheim. Show all posts

Monday, July 29, 2013

Experts for America: Like Teach for America, only Better!


Project 98.6°.

(Dateline: Washington, D.C.) Today, for the second time in less than a month, the U.S. education establishment was rocked by stunning news (See: NFL Adopts Common Core Playbook.) A secret committee of twenty-five veteran teachers, known as Project 98.6°, and working at the behest of President Barack Obama, today announced results of their deliberations.

Nancy Potts, spokesperson for the group, and a classroom veteran of nineteen years, announced a new federal initiative called “Experts for America.”

The program is meant to mirror “Teach for America.” 

Speaking to a gathering of school reform experts, executives of companies hoping to increase their role in public school education and concerned politicians hoping to extend their tenure in office, Potts noted that the time to solve the nation’s school crisis was now.

“All the big names in school reform will be involved,” she noted. “Bill Gates. Wendy Kopp, CEO of Teach for America. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg.”

These remarks were met with thunderous applause. America’s children would finally be saved! 

All of them!


“Every expert in this auditorium will play a role,” Potts continued, with just a hint of disdain. “Joel I. Klein, former chancellor of the New York City Public Schools, you will have a chance to teach. Brent Staples, editorial writer for the New York Times, Richard Whitmire, 
acclaimed education author, Davis Guggenheim, producer of Waiting for Superman, yes, all of you will have a real chance to teach. Michelle Rhee – the most experienced expert among you, will be your mentor and colleague.”

Potts had trouble stifling a laugh.  

Quickly, she turned the microphone over to another member of the secret group, Mr. Horace Mann, an Ohio middle school history teacher for the last twenty-four years.

“First, let me tell you what an honor it is to address you all,” Mann began. “Normally, I spend my time in a 25-by-25-foot room, surrounded by hormone-addled teens. Now, here I am, talking to the men and women who do all the talking about fixing America’s schools.

“When our group first met,” he added, “we began by asking, ‘What would be the best way to improve America’s schools?’


“We heard what all of you were saying. What we really needed, you said, was better teachers. Mr. Staples, 
you have no idea how much you helped. When you reviewed Mr. Guggenheim’s movie, you wrote: ‘Public schools generally do a horrendous job of screening and evaluating teachers, which means that they typically end up hiring and granting tenure to any warm body that comes along.’”

“That was when we decided to call ourselves Project 98.6°,” Ms. Potts interjected helpfully, again trying her hardest not to laugh.

Mann continued. “Oh, yes. Mr. Bloomberg, we heard you too. When you said the biggest problem in education was teachers hired “from the bottom 20% of their [college] classes, and not of the best schools” we stood in awe of your epic brilliance. We listened to all of you and suddenly it was perfectly clear. Who better to save the children than you here in this audience today?”

“So we came up with a plan: ‘Experts for America,’” Potts noted happily.

“With the aid of the Selective Service and approval from President Obama,” Mann explained, “a new draft will be instituted. All education experts between the ages of 23-75, all writers of books about education, all executives of companies profiting from ties to public schools, will be subject to call to active duty.”

“We know this may come as a shock for most of you. But you will be committing to work for ten years – minimum – in the toughest public schools. None of that sissy two-year stuff like ‘Teach for America.’” Mrs. Potts smiled.

“Ten years… I mean…you are committed to saving kids? Right?”

“Here are a few assignments we already know,” Mann continued. “Mr. Bill Gates, you will teach students with severe behavior disorders at Marvin Gardens High School in Seattle. You will be replacing a teacher who was assaulted last May and has not recovered from a broken nose and jaw.”

“No, no,” Gates was heard to shout from a front row seat. “You don't understand. My education foundation only dispenses advice...”


Mann’s face hardened. “You will do just fine. As for you, Mr. Klein and Mr. Bloomberg, you favored grading schools in New York City. It seems perfectly fitting, then, that you work with some of the 
200,000 homeless children in your city. You’ll be evaluated on how they perform on standardized tests. Should they fail to make adequate yearly progress, you will be required to devote another year to ‘Experts for America,’ until you finally get it right.

“We need you, too, Mr. Guggenheim. You made a movie about five wonderful families, all of whom wanted the best education for their kids. You made fixing schools seem simple.

“Now you and Mr. Staples will have the chance. You will work at a special charter school, with children of parents who didn’t sign up for any lottery, who did not care about what school their kids attended. We just picked random kids for you to teach. And trust me when I say, parent conferences are going to be great! You will work with the dad who threatened his daughter with an AK-47 when her grades were low. You will be charged with educating the older son of the man who stuck his six-month-old daughter in the freezer to stop her crying. You will teach a disabled boy, born ten years ago addicted to heroin because his single mother was (and still is) a drug abuser.

“You will have the chance to fix it all. And as a bonus, you will work with the son of the mother who chased the principal out of his school last spring. She was wielding a large butcher knife. That happened at my wife’s school,” Mr. Mann noted.

Guggenheim and Staples both looked stunned.

“Ms. Rhee, you are going back to D.C. to straighten out the mess in one of the schools where you handed out big cash rewards when standardized test scores dramatically improved –where cheating was soon shown to be rampant and wrong answers on test after test after test were erased. And you will be issued special pencils.”

“Yep, no erasers,” Potts interjected.


When Mann added that Whitmire would be drafted to work alongside Rhee – that Secretary of Education Arne Duncan would be assigned to a Chicago charter school, working only with teen gang members – that Kopp would be joining him – that executives from Pearson, the money-making, standardized testing-company, would be sent to Florida to teach in a high poverty school – howls for mercy filled the room.

“The time to turn hot air into action…IS NOW!” Ms. Potts shouted into the microphone. “And don’t worry. You’re all so smart!!! Besides, for the rest of us, watching you fix the schools will mean ten years of fabulous fun!”

Mrs. Potts curtsied.

Mr. Mann bowed.

Both smiled broadly and exited the stage. They had other work to do. They had to get back to their home schools and keep helping kids.






Tuesday, May 24, 2011

A Fairy Tale Called "Waiting for Superman" (Part II)

1, 2, 3, numbers don’t lie, 6, 9, 8, 2 x 7 = 11.

I’M A RETIRED TEACHER. If you’ve read many of my entries you know my purpose is to offer a defense of good public school teachers. And don’t get me wrong. There are bad ones. I know that.

Unfortunately, the idea that schools are failing—and that teachers are entirely to blame—now seems pundit gospel.

Yesterday, I mentioned that I hated Waiting for Superman. If you haven’t seen the documentary let me save you the time.

Davis Guggenheim, who attended an elite private school and sends his kids to an elite private school, styles himself an expert on public education. As a crusading film maker (though not so much of a crusader that he would actually allow his children to rub shoulders with the common folk) he is at pains to point out that in an international ranking in 2006 U. S. students finished 25th in math and 21st in science literacy out of 30 countries.

With all the criticism teachers are taking lately, you can expect to see a story soon that says our students rank 23rd in knitting.

It scares me how “terrible” our schools must be. So I’ve been looking for other signs of America’s impending demise. After all, if Japan beats us in life expectancy and education then our teachers and doctors must be abominable.

Well, here’s the next list to prove we’re screwed. It’s not just crappy teachers. It’s not just horrible doctors. Our police are miserable. I mean: it can’t be complex differences in society, right, dear pundits?

What do we discover if we study the chart below? This time we rate countries on the basis of murder? Here are results—lowest (best) to highest (worst)—for thirty-two member-countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development:

MURDERS PER 100,000 IN POPULATION

1. Iceland
2. Japan
3. Austria
4. Slovenia
5. Norway
6. Switzerland
7. Germany
8. Spain
9. Sweden


10. Netherlands
11. Greece
12. Italy
13. Poland
14. Portugal
15. England/Wales
16. Australia
17. New Zealand
18. Northern Ireland
19. France
20. Denmark


21. Hungary
22. Luxembourg
23. Canada
24. Slovakia
25. Belgium
26. Czech Republic
27. Ireland
28. Scotland
29. South Korea
30. Israel

31. Finland
32. UNITED STATES


NOT ONLY DO U. S. law enforcement officers rank last in protecting the citizenry, they rank last by six feet and a mile. The Netherlands falls to tenth place with one murder per 100,000 in population. The Czech Republic and Ireland rank near the bottom with two murders. Finland may be strong in math and reading, but they need better cops, pronto. Or maybe help counting corpses. They land in 31st place with 2.5 murders.

We rank at the bottom with 5.2 murders for every 100,000 people.

Or, to put it another way, Davis Guggenheim’s next movie should probably be called Waiting for Dirty Harry.


Monday, May 23, 2011

A Fairy Tale called "Waiting for Superman"

Corrected 4-7-15

ONE OF MY FAVORITE FORMER STUDENTS asked me recently what I thought of the documentary, Waiting for Superman. It was some time before I had a chance to watch it. When I did, it made me mad. Parts of the film are good. Geoffrey Canada, creator of the Harlem Children’s Zone, features prominently and Canada seems like a dedicated educator.

Unfortunately, the rest of the movie creates a flat and one-dimensional impression.

Producer Davis Guggenheim starts with five youngsters whose parents or guardians want them to get a better education than the nearest public schools can apparently provide. We follow five wonderful children and their families through the lottery process to get into “better” charter schools.

If they don’t, of course, their dreams are crushed.

A lot of people who saw the film came away with this impression: the people doing the crushing were sack-of-crap unionized teachers.

Brent Staples, writing for The New York Times, warned readers who planned to see the film to take along a handkerchief. Who exactly plays the role of villain? Staples makes that crystal clear: “Public schools generally do a horrendous job of screening and evaluating teachers, which means that they typically end up hiring and granting tenure to any warm body that comes along.”

My reaction to that statement? Apparently the Times does a poor job of screening writers and lets idiots pen editorials.

Guggenheim focuses on the famous “rubber rooms” in the New York City Public Schools, where 700 teachers are pigeonholed. These 700 face termination for various reasons, but the union makes it hard to fire them. So they wait out the time till their hearings, often months, in some cases years, collecting their pay—and oh-those-damn-unions!

SEVEN HUNDRED TERRIBLE TEACHERS sucking up tax dollars. God, if only we could get rid of teachers’ unions!

Here’s what real teachers know (or at least this real retired teacher who had time to check it out):

First: The New York City Public Schools employ 80,000 teachers. To focus on 700 is an insult to the other 99.125%.

(Just because Guggenheim made a terrible movie, for example, that doesn’t mean we need to criticize John Ford or Orson Welles.)

Second:  A recent article in the Times noted that in one year 140,000 students in the system missed more than a month of classes. If you’re a teacher, you think: that’s a lot of parents shirking their responsibility.

In fact, if I do the math that’s 200 bad parents for every single bad teacher tucked away in the rubber room.

Third: Not all children have good parents. If you want to form a clear understanding of education you have to look at dysfunctional families, too. That’s where most of the intractable problems begin. At my wife’s old school, for example, a mother stopped by the main office one afternoon and told the secretary she wanted to see the principal.

Exactly the kind of parent Guggenheim had in mind when he made his film. The concerned mother! Only this mother was more than concerned. She informed the office secretary she was “tired of being followed.” The secretary did a double take when she noticed the woman was carrying a butcher knife. When the principal overheard their conversation she stepped out of her office and mom lunged at her with the knife, missed, but chased her down the hall and out across the parking lot.

Fear made the principal fleet and she got away. But the question none of the “experts” ever ask—or even know they should ask—is how do we help the child in a case such as thhis? With a lottery system to get him into a better school?

Really? Does anyone believe this mom was going to have her wits about her to enter her child in a lottery to begin with?

For two years, I’ve been working on a book about what it’s like to be a teacher. I assure you: I loved teaching. I’m just sick of all the criticism being laid at the feet of America’s teachers. At a New Years’ Eve party a few months ago I asked a probation officer for Hamilton County, which includes the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, how many cases of child abuse and neglect Children’s Services handled every year.

He said about 8,500.

So, yes, there are bad teachers. (I even knew a few.) You should try being a teacher, though, and see how many bad parents you run into.

Maybe some of my former students will read this and comment: I think they’ll say I gave every kid a lot of chances to pass. Unfortunately, even a good teacher can only do so much if problems at home are severe. One year, I had a boy named Mike in my history class.

Mike stayed home “sick” 106 days.

Two weeks after the school year ended, mom called me at home (I gave my number to parents and students). She wanted to know if Mike could still pass seventh grade. I told her, sorry, he had failed my history class and every other class, including gym, and it was too late.

That’s the kind of parent, a minority in every community, maybe 10%, that makes problems for every public school and every public school teacher in America.

THAT’S JUST PART of what you don’t see in Waiting for Superman.

If I had to grade the film, I’d give it an F.


Guggenheim, pictured with Courtney Love.
You figure he spends most of his time with celebrities
and not much time rubbing elbows with the regular folk.

Friday, May 20, 2011

Numbers Don't Lie: Our Teachers (and Doctors) Are Failing


I RETIRED FROM TEACHING three years ago. So I finally have time to do a little writing. If you follow education news these days you have to know public school teachers are being fed a steady diet of abuse by critics. When U. S. students are compared and ranked, internationally, based on test scores the results are depressing.

It has to be teachers, right? Not long ago, Glenn Beck lumped teachers’ unions in with Islamic terrorists. Seriously. The movie Waiting for Superman made it look like teachers were a bunch of slugs. Here in Ohio Governor Kasich acts like we’re Vikings intent on ransacking the State Treasury.

I talk to teachers these days and find them more discouraged than at any time since I first became interested in a career in education. So my blog will always be a defense of good teachers—but never bad ones. 

There’s a difference, which most of our leaders and almost all of the critics seem to forget. Take Arne Duncan. He says education reform is “all about the talent.”

He means it’s all about teachers.

Trust me:  I’m a liberal. I voted for President Obama and always knew he had a valid birth certificate. But I’d like to sock Mr. Duncan, his Secretary of Education in the jaw. (Same goes for Davis Guggenheim, producer of Waiting for Superman, by the way.)

If you listen to critics this is what you hear:  We have a “school crisis” on our hands. How do we know? We know because our students finished 25th in math in 2006, when students from thirty nations were tested. Worse, we spend more on education than almost all the countries that beat us. See:  America’s teachers are lazy and overpaid.

Here were the bleak math results in 2006:
  1. Finland
  2. South Korea
  3. Netherlands
  4. Switzerland
  5. Canada
  6. Japan
  7. New Zealand
  8. Belgium
  9. Australia
  10. Denmark
  11. Czech Republic
  12. Iceland
  13. Austria
  14. Germany
  15. Sweden
  16. Ireland
  17. France
  18. United Kingdom
  19. Poland
  20. Slovak Republic
  21. Hungary
  22. Luxembourg
  23. Norway
  24. Spain 
  25. UNITED STATES
  26. Portugal
  27. Italy
  28. Greece
  29. Turkey
  30. Mexico
Study that list a bit and it can seem depressing. Our poor students were just baffled when it came to multiplying decimals and transforming common fractions into percentages. Who else could you blame? It had to be teachers.

In my case, I looked at that list for a long time and wondered. Was America going to math hell in a hand basket?

WHAT OTHER PROBLEMS WERE CRITICS MISSING? Was it just America’s teachers who were failing? Or was there a broader cultural failure to concern us?

What about doctors?

Time magazine provided the first hint of danger in a brief comparison (December 12, 2008) of health care systems round the world. After that, I was on the story like Woodward and Bernstein, or maybe just Woodward, since it’s just me.

Health care costs in the United States ate up 16% of GDP, the highest figure in the world, a per capita cost of $7,026. Life expectancy was 77.8 years.

Japan spent 7.9% of GDP, or $2,690 per capita. Yet the Japanese lived an average of 83 years.

Numbers don’t lie and the more numbers you study the more lying you don’t see. School reformers like Secretary Duncan assure us that if we collect enough data and tie test results to teacher pay we can save American education. Maybe we can collect enough data to save hospitals, too. In southern Minnesota people live into their 80’s. People in eastern Kentucky live a mere 72.6 years.

What’s needed, clearly, is a system to rate doctors and nurses in Minnesota “excellent” and medical people in Kentucky “failing” or under “academic watch” or some category of that nature. Or we could fire all the Kentucky medical people and get some real professionals in there to clean up the mess.

In fact, to get a picture of how our oncologists and proctologists are doing, let’s gather some data. Compare life expectancy in the same countries that beat out our brains in math.

Here were the dismal “health care” rankings for 2009:

1.    Japan                          
2.    Australia                     
3.    Canada                                   
4.    France                        
5.    Sweden                      
6.    Switzerland                
7.    Iceland                                   
8.    Israel                          
9.    New Zealand             
10.  Italy                            
11.  Norway                      
12.  Spain                          
13.  Austria                                   
14.  Greece                        
15.  Netherlands                
16.  Luxembourg               
17.  Germany                    
18.  Belgium                      
19.  Finland           
20.  United Kingdom        
21.  Denmark                    
22.  Ireland                        
23.  Portugal                      
24.  UNITED STATES    
25.  Czech Republic          
26.  Mexico                       
27.  South Korea               
28.  Poland                        
29.  Slovakia                     
30.  Turkey                     


So, what do simple lists prove? If America’s teachers are failing, a truth the media universally accept, then this chart proves that U. S. doctors are lazy and overpaid idiots—and they aren’t even unionized.

(Thank god they don't have tenure!!!)

So, Mr. Duncan, if you ever do get punched in the nose by an angry, retired teacher, head for Canada if you want good affordable health care.

And don’t mention our terrible doctors to Glenn Beck.

He’ll only start crying.

(For even MORE chilling statistical evidence go to:  “America's Teachers Stink Up the Place Again.”