__________
“A faithful study of the liberal arts humanizes character and permits it not to be cruel.”
Ovid.
__________
NOTE TO TEACHERS: Will
students understand what happens to paper money, if a government collapses?
SIR HENRY CLINTON and British forces continue to occupy New York City,
all during the year.
Enlistments in the American army run out, and the number of men under
arms gradually declines.
*
January 23: According to the diary of Abner Weston, recently recovered, Deborah
Sampson attempts to enlists in the Continental Army, not earlier, as she would
later claim. Weston himself had served in the Massachusetts militia and in his
diaries (he created three) talks about being sent to Rhode Island to help
defend that state in 1780.
On this date, he wrote: “Their
hapend a uncommon affair at this time, for Deborah Samson of this town dress
her self in men’s cloths and hired her self to Israel Wood to go into the three
years Servis. But being found out returnd the hire and paid the Damages.”
Caught once, in May she tried again, shifting
her plan to Bellingham, forty miles away. This time, in a town where no one
knew her, she succeeded, enlisting under the name of Robert Shurtleff.
The New York Times notes:
Dressing as a man was considered a crime in
Massachusetts at the time, and Sampson’s audacity later invited the wrath of
the Baptist church. In September 1782, while she, long gone, served with her
unit under an assumed name, church elders, still reeling from her earlier
attempt to enlist, excommunicated her, citing her for “dressing in men’s
cloths and inlisting” and other conduct they considered “loose and
unChristian like.”
After the war, Sampson fought to get a
veteran’s pension, a partially successful battle in which she had the aid of
Paul Revere and John Hancock
As The New York Times explains, his third diary, just found, “is a hand-stitched, 68-page account of the period between March 28, 1781 and August 16, 1782, which Weston updated while back home in Middleborough, Mass., where Sampson also lived.”
*
Step forward, if “inclined toward mercy.”
March 8: The Lenni Lenape (or Delaware Indians) living in Ohio face a difficult
decision. They have already moved west once, to remove themselves from the path
of the settlers, and also to put distance between themselves and their bitter enemies,
the Iroquois.
With the outbreak of the
Revolution, they must decide whether to throw in their lot with the British or
the Americans.
Like the Americans,
themselves, who split, Patriot, Tory, and neutral, the Lenni Lenape divided. A
Christian group, having learned pacifism from Moravian missionaries, like David
Zeisberger (who had been working with the natives since 1771) settled at
Gnadenhutten. Many Lenape living near Coshocton joined the fighting against the
settlers; but a punishing raid against the Ohio tribes in 1781 did not molest
the Indians at Gnadenhutten, largely due to the refusal of Col. Daniel Brodhead
to allow his troops to destroy the Christian Indian towns.
The missionaries
continued to worry about being dragged into the war. Passing warriors from
other tribes and even some Lenni Lenape, who had decided to join the British
side, tried to convince men at Gnadenhutten to give up the path of Christianity
and join them in battle.
As Zeisberger put it,
Satan rages … not only from without, but also from within. For
in the church there were people who upheld them [the warlike natives] in their
false dispositions and applauded them, who wished to establish by force that
wicked life of his and heathenism. If we oppose them they become angry and set
on the wild Indians against us … Such a change has now come in the Indian
church that the bad, wicked people can not be cast out, but they wish to be
there and to cause harm in the church, for they in the wild towns have occasion
enough therefor and no one would say any thing to them about their sinful
life.”
Suspecting that
Zeisberger was secretly supplying the Americans with information, the British forced
the Christian Indians to move north to what became known as “Captives Town.”
They were not fed well, and in February 1782 returned to Gnadenhutten to harvest
crops and gather food stored there. A native raiding party that had attacked
settlements in Pennsylvania passed by on their way home, telling the Christian
Indians that they had impaled two prisoners, a woman and child, on the western
bank of the Ohio River. Soon after, the Moravian community was surprised by a
force of frontier militia, led by Lt. Col. David Williamson. The soldiers
gathered together 96 Lenni Lenape, and argued about what should be done with
them. Williamson lined his men up, told any of more than a hundred men present
to step forward if “inclined to mercy.”
Only 16 or 18 stepped
forward and it was decided: All the prisoners would be killed.
The prisoners were
divided in two buildings, one for men, one for women and children. After they
were told of the vote, they spent the night praying and singing hymns.
Several of the militia
men refused to take part in any killing. One who voted against it was Obadiah
Holmes Jr. He described what happened the next day:
one Nathan Rollins
& brother [who] had had a father & uncle killed took the lead in
murdering the Indians, ...& Nathan Rollins had tomahawked nineteen of the
poor Moravians, & after it was over he sat down & cried, & said it
was no satisfaction for the loss of his father & uncle after all.
The toll included 28
men, 29 women and 39 children, most victims having been scalped. At least one
boy, some say two, escaped to tell the story. One survivor was supposedly scalped, but
lived.
Another account says 34
victims were children.
Ben Franklin heard news
of the massacre even in faraway France. In a letter to a friend in England, he
wrote:
the abominable Murders committed by some of the frontier People
on the poor Moravian Indians, has given me infinite Pain and Vexation. The
Dispensations of Providence in this World puzzle my weak Reason. I cannot
comprehend why cruel Men should have been permitted thus to destroy their
Fellow Creatures.
Three decades later,
Tecumseh could still remind General William Henry Harrison of the heartless
murder of the Moravian Indians. “You recall the time when the Jesus Indians of
the Delawares lived near the Americans,” he said in 1810, “and had confidence
in their promises of friendship, and thought they were secure, yet the
Americans murdered all the men, women, and children, even as they prayed to
Jesus?”
In 1889, Theodore
Roosevelt could call the massacre “a stain on frontier character that the lapse of
time cannot wash away.”
Picture from Wikipedia. |
*
Col. William Crawford, a friend of George Washington, was captured by
Lenape warriors a few months later. He had had no hand in the attack at
Gnadenhutten.
A friend of Crawford’s, Dr. Knight, also
taken prisoner at that time, told the writer James B. Finley what happened. The
unfortunate Crawford was tied to a pole in the middle of their village and
preparations made for torture.
a loud whoop burst
from the Indians, and they all rushed at once upon the unfortunate Crawford.
For several seconds the crowd was so great around him that Knight could not see
what they were doing. But in a short time they had spread out, and he had a
view of Colonel Crawford.
His ears had been cut off, and
the blood was streaming down each side of his face. A terrible scene of torture
now began. The warriors shot charges of gunpowder into his naked body, starting
at the calves of his legs, and continuing to his neck. The boys snatched
burning hickory poles and stuck them on his flesh. As fast as he ran around the
stake [where he was tied by a 15-foot rope] to avoid one group...he was
met...by another party. They used burning poles, red-hot irons, and rifles
loaded with powder only. In a few minutes nearly one hundred shots of powder
had been fired into his body, which had become black and blistered in a
dreadful manner. The squaws would take up quantities of coals and hot ashes and
throw them upon his body, so that in a few moments he had nothing to walk on
but fire.
[After two hours]...Crawford had
become much exhausted. He walked slowly around the stake, speaking in a low
tone. He [begged] God to look with pity upon him, and pardon his sins. His
nerves had lost much of their feeling, and he no longer shrunk [away] from the
fire-brands with which he was constantly touched. At last he sunk in a fainting
fit upon his face and lay motionless. Instantly an Indian sprung upon his back,
kneeled lightly on one knee, and made a circular cut with his knife upon the
top of Crawford’s head. Clapping his knife between his teeth, he tore the scalp
off with both hands. Hardly had this been done when an old woman approached
with a board full of burning embers, and poured them upon the crown of his
head, now laid bare to the bone. The Colonel groaned deeply, arose, and again
walked slowly around the stake. But why continue a description so horrible?
Nature at length could stand no more, and at a late hour in the night Crawford
was released by death from the hands of his tormentors.
NOTE TO TEACHERS: I
sometimes paired these two incidents and tried to show students how one
atrocity led to another, in a chain of events, until it became almost
impossible to see who was to blame. Usually, the innocent suffered for the sins
of the guilty, on both sides of the fighting.
I called it the “Cycle of Violence.” I think the
same cycle plays out in gang warfare in American cities, in clashes between
Bosnians and Serbs, and for many years did also in Northern Ireland, between
Protestant and Catholic.
You can pick all kinds of examples: Israeli vs.
Palestinian, Hindu vs. Muslim in India, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment