June 5: The U.S. goes off the gold standard. |
____________________
“Stall for time. Trade dollars for time. Time. Time
for the country to collect its wits. Time for the people to pull themselves
together, shake their fears, recover their sense of humor, take heart. Time so
that America would not default to madmen and lunatics and their wicked dreams.”
Wolfskill and
Hudson on FDR’s battle to save the country
____________________
March 4: Franklin D. Roosevelt
is inaugurated. George Wolfskill writes:
It was bitter cold – the penetrating cold of despair. Cold for the
throngs already beginning to gather; cold for the troops manning the machine
guns strategically located – just in case. Everywhere there was a sense of
foreboding, heavy and oppressive, as New York Times reporter Arthur Krock
wrote later, “comparable to that which might be found in a beleaguered capital
in wartime.” (1127-2)
*
Samuel Grafton, writing in the New York Post, would later
explain FDR’s immediate impact: “He had no answers that were good for a hundred
years. But in a six-month crisis he always had a six-month answer.”
Wolfskill and John S. Hudson put it this way in All but the
People, written in 1969. Roosevelt’s approach:
Stall for
time. Trade dollars for time. Time. Time for the country to collect its wits. Time
for the people to pull themselves together, shake their fears, recover their
sense of humor, take heart. Time so that America would not default to madmen and
lunatics and their wicked dreams. Time so that honest men could find solid
answers to pressing problems that the country had been ignoring and fending off
for years. Time to vindicate Roosevelt’s dream of the middle way. (1127-189)
As Harry Hopkins once put it, “I am for experimenting… trying out
schemes which are supported by reasonable people and see if they work. If they
do not work, the world will not come to an end.” (1127-192)
*
When Black Lives Clearly
Didn’t Matter.
April 10: In an article
titled “Scottsboro Shadow,” in Christian Century magazine, Renwick C.
Kennedy tells the story of Alexander Pruitt, 40, a World War I veteran who had
seen combat and “thought it probable that he had killed a few Germans.” One
October morning, as he took “his tenth drink from a jug of Pensacola Rye,”
Kennedy says, Pruitt got to thinking about all the “niggers,” and it got him
all riled up. At 2:00 p.m. he took his .38 revolver from a drawer.
Ten minutes
later he was down in the cotton patch behind the house where Long Son Gilmore
and Henry Jeter, two Negro men, were picking cotton. Both were Alexander’s
tenants and his friends, and had made good crops for him that year. Ordinarily
too kind to them. This afternoon his justice and kindness were paralyzed with
the most potent whisky available in southern Alabama.
The Negroes continued
to pick cotton as they watched him stumble and fall along the cotton row.
“Cap’n’s sho’
drunk,” said Long Son.
“He sho’-God
is,” said Henry. “He’ll be cussin’ us, drunk as he is.”
“Niggers,”
said Alec solemnly, “you ain’t done nothin’ since ten o’clock. Git to work. Git
this dman cotton out.”
The men said little in return, but continued to pick the cotton
and stuff it in the large bags each carried from a shoulder.
Alec stood
behind them, cursing. He stepped closer to Long Son, pulled out the .38, and
shot him in the back of his head. The bullet smashed Son’s brain and came out
of his left eye. As Henry later said, Son never knew what hit him. Henry threw
his bag down and ran. Alec fired the remaining five cartridges at him, but his
drunken aim was no good, and Henry escaped to the village to tell the story.
An hour later
a deputy sheriff came from the county seat, and that night Alec slept off his
drunk in the county jail. The next morning he said he did not remember anything
that had happened since ten o’clock of the previous day, and that he was
astonished to find himself in jail.
Bond was set at $1,000, and Pruitt hired a lawyer. There was a
time when Pruitt could have expected to walk out free; but times, in Kennedy’s
telling, were changing. “You ain’t got no case,” Pruitt’s lawyer tells him,
“except that it was a nigger.” He promises to pack the jury with other
veterans.
He told the
jury how Alec had defended his country in the world war, and had been wounded.
His health was hopelessly broken and in recognition of this the government had
given him a monthly pension. His nerves were shattered and he was often in
pain. He drank whiskey, yes; but he had to drink to quiet his nerves and to
still the pain. Tortured with pain one day, he drank too much, and in a state
of total irresponsibility he, a white man, a white man let the jury member,
went out and killed a nigger. Let the jury consider the circumstances and
conditions and set free this poor broken wreck, this man who was rather to be
pitied than censured for what had happened, this white man who had offered his
life in defense of his country and who at best had but a few more years to live.
The solicitor
stated the facts of the case, called it cold-blooded murder and asked for the
death penalty.
The judge
charged the jury as to its duty and its possible findings and those twelve worthy
men filed into the jury room.
Thirty minutes
later they reported. The foreman stood forward to read the verdict.
“We the jury
find the defendant not guilty,” he read.
Alec rose up
by the table in the bar where he sat. His face beamed with happiness. He had
been vindicated. He spoke up in court and asked the judge for permission to
shake hands with the members of the jury. The judge replied rather harshly that
that was no concern of his, but to step outside if he wished to do it.
That night a member of the jury explained how it was. He believed
that “by rights” Pruitt should have had ten years in jail. He said he tried to
get the others to sentence the defendant to three years. “but when I seen they
wouldn’t do it I said we ought to give him ten days and $50 just to be givin’
him somethin’.” Other members of the jury got to “talkin’ about the Scottsboro
case. They said they couldn’t convict no white man for killin’ a nigger in
Alabama after the Scottsboro case. I reckon’ they’re right, too White people
have to stick together somehow, or we’ll have to git out and let the niggers
have the state.”
*
“Is the Negro in a Trap?”
April 19: The fate of the
Scottsboro boys hangs with the U.S. Supreme Court again. As Christian
Century magazine reports, in an editorial, pp. 520-522, “Is the Negro in a
Trap?”
After twenty
hours of deliberation the Alabama jury sitting on the first of the Scottsboro
cases to be retried brought in a verdict of guilty. The verdict carried a jury
vote in favor of death. It is expected that the state will now press for quick
trials of the other six defendants. Since the cases are identical, it is
impossible to hope for different verdicts. These Negro boys will again be
sentenced to die for an alleged attack upon two white girls, one of whom now
denies that any such attack a occurred. …
The consequent retrial in the case of the first defendant hinged
on the testimony of the girls. This was absolutely contradictory. Although both
agreed that they were together during the period when the attack was alleged to
have taken place, one denied and the other affirmed the actuality of the
incident. If ever a condition of “reasonable doubt” can arise it would seem to
be under such a confusion In vital testimony, yet the jury is reported to have
reached its verdict immediately and to have been delayed only in fixing the punishment.
…
It is good to
feel that the final hope for these young Negroes is not lost with the verdict
of this rural Alabama jury. But to those who study the Scottsboro cases as
parts of the most baffling social problem in American life, a problem that is
growing more dangerous every year, there is slight comfort in the possibility
of another reversal by the supreme court. Undoubtedly The general feeling in
Alabama __ and throughout the South –is that the Decatur trial is significant,
not because of its outcome, but because of its demonstration of the lengths to
which the state would go (under pressure) to grant a Negro the benefit of the
forms of law. The tendency is now to turn to the rest of the nation – and to
Negroes everywhere – and say, “What more could be done to insure due process of
law?” Too few will be those who sense even faintly the despair in the Negro
heart at the growing conviction that what this Decatur trial really signifies
is, that whatever the forms observed, the fate of the Negro turns out to be
unchanged.
…the Decatur verdict, and what has gone with it, has revealed once
more a condition within the nation of terrible menace. … One-tenth of our
American population lives constantly under a sense of jeopardy. It believes
that it is trapped. It feels no more certain of justice, opportunity, fair dealing
than an animal at the mercy of an irresponsible hunter. A life of rectitude may
lead to a measure of community approbation; it may just as well lead to death
at the hands of some irresponsible mob. Booker T. Washington was almost beaten
to death for the crime of looking at the names on an apartment house mailbox. (That,
be it noted, happened in New York City!) …
…But always the Negro has remained at the mercy of the mob – in Chicago
as much as in the South. And that has meant not only jeopardy of life (that,
thank God, is growing less as the years pass!) but jeopardy of occupation, jeopardy
of residence, jeopardy of opportunity for children, jeopardy in court. (It
would be revealing to discover over a ten-year period, how large a proportion
of the persons actually executed in northern prisons are friendless Negroes.)
No white man can fully enter into this black man’s world of jeopardy. But no
white man with social imagination could fail to understand, at least dimly, how
insecure it renders the future of American life. One American in every ten living
under the tension produced by this ceaseless gnawing fear!
In the years after Emancipation, the editorial notes, philanthropic
whites tried to lead the Negro race. “Then came the leadership of the Booker T.
Washington school,” which focused on economic gains.
Latterly, however, there has emerged a more radical type of
leadership, dating from the rise of Dr. DuBois, proclaiming itself
disillusioned as to the readiness of the white man to do justice until the
Negro organizes to demand and compel justice. It is this new leadership,
intensely scornful of what it calls the “Uncle Tom” sort of Negro who is
obsequient in the white’s presence, that has set rumbling deep undertones of
anger and desperation in American Negro life since the war. Today, even Dr.
DuBois is on the edge of being displaced by a still more radical leadership
within his race.
Christian Century refers to the
defendants as “heedless, moronic young drifters,” “pawns” in the battle for
justice, and notes that they have been caught up in questions of Marxist class struggle.
“The prosecuting attorney even called upon the jury to hang the accused as a rebuke
to the machinations of ‘Jew money.’”
That latter
note in the prosecutor’s speech is worth pondering in these days when so much
indignation is being registered in the United States over the anti-Semitism of
Adolf Hitler. We have no doubt but that Hitler and his nazis will do
incalculable harm to Germany if they continue in their course. But it is by no
means sure that the open and calculated brutality of their program will do more
harm to Germany, in the long run, then will the hypocrisy and callousness of
our Nordics to America. Hitler is blasted by our scorn for putting under jeopardy
less than one per cent of the population of Germany; it is to forced back the
advancing claims of a tenth of the people of the United States that the racial,
sectional and social prejudices of the whites are mobilized in such
eventualities as the Scottsboro affair.
But to return
to the main issue, the principal national significance of these Decatur trials
is going to be the increase in the Negro’s sense of desperation. What the Negro
will see is not the carefully observed forms of the law; what he will see is
the (to him) foreordained verdict. His is becoming the psychology of the
trapped. Most of the South – no, we believe that the truth compels it to be
said that most of the whites of the nation – when confronted with the
desperation of the trapped turn instinctively to the tightening of the trap.
*
Dorothea Lange was born in Hoboken in 1895. Her father abandoned the family when she was 12. A childhood bout of polio, according to The New Yorker, left her with a lifelong limp. Lange said it “formed me, guided me, instructed me, helped me, and humiliated me.” In 1918, she and a friend were planning a world tour; but those plans ended in San Francisco, when they were robbed. Lange found patrons, opened up a photography studio, married Maynard Dixon, and they had two children.
White Angel of the Breadline. |
Lange: Ex-Slave with Long Memory. |
Lange. Gunlock, Utah, Mormon. |
Lange. Hopi Indian. |
Her picture, “White Angel of the Bread Line, San Francisco,” in 1933 became a sensation. Three years later, she took her most famous photo, “Migrant Mother.” Her subject for that photo was Florence Owens, a Cherokee woman, although Owens was not identified until 47 years later.
She was not a “pea picker,” as Lange believed, but she and her family had stopped at a pea field in Nimpomo, California to await a car repair. That picture, one writer said, revealed the “rock-hard realities” the displaced faced.
*
December 25: Sears, Roebuck and Company’s catalogue has helped shoppers decide on gifts for friends and loved ones. Time (12/20/1982) gives some of the prices listed, with a dollar in 1933, worth in 1982, $7.58. Silk stockings: 78 cents; two-pound fruitcake, 49 cents; man’s cotton broadcloth shirt, $1.69. Black leather oxford shoes for women were $1.98. An 18-karat white gold ring could be purchased for $54.90. A Kenmore upright vacuum was $17.45, a Lionel electric train set was $12.79, a 15-in. Teddy bear cost $1.79. A Mickey Mouse watch was $2.29, and Mickey wore white gloves.
In 1932, the average household income was $32 per week,
compared to $497 in 1981, and (when I checked) $1,321 in 2019.
Babe Ruth's career is on the down slope. For the first time in eight seasons, he fails to hit at least 40 homeruns. |
No comments:
Post a Comment